Review of “The Reasons Why Capitalism is not Good for the Poor”
The author of this essay argues that capitalism is not good for the poor, citing examples of how the rich get richer while the poor get poorer. He also points out that the poor often have to work in poor conditions and lack access to healthcare and education.
While the author makes a valid point, it is worth noting that capitalism is not the only system that has these problems. In fact, many of these issues are also found in countries with socialist or communist systems. Furthermore, it is not clear that capitalism is necessarily to blame. Many of these problems are also found in developing countries that are not capitalistic.
The parenting style that this essay discusses is the authoritarian parenting style. This style is where the parents are very engaged in forcible behavioral control and the child is more likely to be worried, sad, and low in self-reliance and self-esteem. I do not agree with this parenting style because I think it is too restrictive and can result in the child having low self-esteem and being withdrawn. I also think that the authoritative parenting style is a better option because it is more accepting and involves the child in decision making. This parenting style is related to various aspects of the child’s life such as self-control, academic performance, responsiveness to parents’ views, task persistence, and social and moral development.
Overall, this essay does a good job of summarizing the many different gases that contribute to climate change, and the difficulties in attributing recent increases in methane levels to specific sources. However, it is less successful in providing specific solutions for reducing emissions from these gases.
Overall, the use of technology in the translation field has been extremely beneficial. It has eased the process, increased accuracy, and allowed for a broader range of translations. While there are some areas that still need improvement, such as the use of technology in real translation working environments, the translation field has come a long way because of technology.
In conclusion, George Orwell’s novel, 1984 is a great example of the dangers of totalitarianism, and the lengths to which a government will go to in order to control its population. Although, it was written during the Cold War, the novel is still relevant today because the ideas that Orwell warned about are still present in our society.
I found this essay to be well-written and insightful. The author does a good job of exploring the themes of the play and providing examples to support their points. I would recommend this essay to anyone who wants to learn more about The Crucible.
Orwell has written a novel that is timeless in its representation of the human condition. While the fear of government control may not be as prevalent today, the need for freedom is. Orwell has given us a gift in his writing- the ability to see the world as it could be, and to fight for the freedom we all deserve.
