in new

Rhetorical Analysis of ‘Get a Knife, Get a Dog, But Get Rid of Guns’ Essay Sample

Critical response to Molly Ivins’ “Get a Knife, Get a Dog, But Get Rid of Guns”

In her column “Get a Knife, Get a Dog, But Get Rid of Guns,” Molly Ivins argues for the abolition of guns in the United States. Ivins’ argument is lighthearted and satirical, but she does make a few valid points. Ivins begins by saying that guns are dangerous and that people should replace them with knives. She argues that knives are more dangerous than guns, but they are still legal. Ivins also argues that cars are more dangerous than guns, but no one is trying to ban them. Ivins then argues that dogs are a better form of protection than guns. Dogs can be

Write a Comment

Comment